White box penetration testing is also known as clear-box, open-box, auxiliary, and logic-driven testing. Black box and white box are polar opposites, research in that penetration testers have direct access to source code, architecture documentation, and so on.
White box testing is the most time-consuming form of penetration testing because it requires sifting through the vast volume of data available to find possible points of vulnerability.
White box penetration testers, unlike black box and grey box testers, can conduct static code analysis, making experience with source code analyzers, debuggers, and other related methods essential for this style of research.
White box penetration testing is the perfect option for estimation testing since it offers a thorough evaluation of all internal and external vulnerabilities. The tight partnership between white-box pen-testers and developers offers a high degree of machine awareness, but it may influence tester activity because they work on information that hackers don’t have.
Types of White Box Testing
White box testing refers to a variety of test methods that are used to assess the usability of a programme, a piece of code, or a particular software package. The following are some examples:
Memory leaks Test: These are some of the most common triggers of slow-running applications. When you have a slow-running device programme, you need a QA expert who is skilled at identifying memory leakage.
Unit Test: The first type of application structural testing performed. When each unit or block of code is created, it is subjected to unit testing. The programmer is mostly responsible for unit testing. As a software developer, you write a few lines of code, a single operation, or an entity, and validate it to ensure it functions before moving on to the next step. a unit Early in the software development lifecycle, testing aids in the detection of the bulk of defects. Bugs discovered at this point are less expensive and easier to repair.
Regression Test: The tester runs additional checks to ensure that a new update in the application’s code hasn’t broken existing features. Test cases that have already been run are rerun to ensure that previously developed and checked features are working as anticipated. It ensures that the old code continues to function after bugs have been fixed, extra security features added, or other improvements have been made.
Integration testing: Integration testing is an essential part of the development process. Individual units or components of the application’s source code are combined and tested as a group in this form of white box testing. The aim is to reveal flaws in how the various interfaces communicate with one another. It happens after unit testing is completed.
White Box Testing Techniques
Code Coverage Analysis is a common White box testing technique. A Test Case suite’s holes are filled with Code Coverage review. It distinguishes parts of a programme that aren’t put to the test in a series of test cases. You build test cases to check untested sections of the code until the holes have been found, thus improving the consistency of the software product.
Code coverage analysis can be performed using automated methods. A box tester can use the following coverage analysis techniques:
- Statement Coverage
During the software engineering testing process, this technique requires that every possible statement in the code be tested at least once.
- Branch Coverage
This technique examines a software application’s entire path (if-else and other conditional loops).
There are a slew of other coverage categories, including Condition Coverage, Multiple Condition Coverage, Path Coverage, and Function Coverage, in addition to the aforementioned ones. – approach has its own set of benefits, and they all seek to test (cover) any element of software code. Using Statement and Branch coverage, you will normally achieve 80-90 percent code coverage, which is adequate.
Following are important WhiteBox Testing Techniques:
- Statement Coverage
- Decision Coverage
- Branch Coverage
- Condition Coverage
- Multiple Condition Coverage
- Finite State Machine Coverage
- Path Coverage
- Control flow testing
- Data flow testing
The advantages of White Box Penetration Testing
Advantages of white box testing is more useful to companies when it reveals flaws that aren’t readily apparent during a penetration test but could pose a security danger.
White box pen testing is extensive
This approach blends the skills of an experienced security specialist with a track record of using white box penetration testing techniques to perform static and dynamic analysis (code review) (fuzzing). It provides a thorough method for identifying all potential components that could pose a security risk.
This method combines the expertise of a seasoned security expert with a history of doing static and dynamic analysis (code review) using white box penetration testing techniques (fuzzing). It offers a comprehensive framework for detecting all possible security threats.
Since the pen tester has direct access to classified information, the findings of this test are guaranteed to be more detailed than those of other penetration tests. It also provides insight to the security analyst, as developers extensively clarify every new deployment.
It makes the most use of the time spent testing
Since the tester has all of the required and vital details, white box penetration testing is simple to automate. It increases the amount of time spent researching by allowing samples to be traced back to their origins. This procedure allows future modifications to the source to be captured in the newly updated or changed experiments.
Tests Areas That Black Box Testing Can’t Reach
You can test any current condition with white box penetration testing, even those that aren’t feasible with black box testing. With a full understanding of the device and network technology, the pen tester’s scope expands. More bugs are exposed as a result of the procedure, as well as hidden bottlenecks that can go unnoticed during black box testing.
The disadvantage of White Box Penetration Testing
White box research has many drawbacks, including its high cost, constantly evolving code and missing events.
Because white box testing is more thorough, it takes a long time and costs a lot of money to complete. Although unit tests help to mitigate this to some extent, writing unit tests requires an initial investment. Furthermore, with large applications, this type of testing can be difficult to scale. It’s nearly impossible to test every branch of code.
White box testing, as opposed to black box testing, necessitates the use of experienced testers who are also programmers. This raises the price and will cause developers to abandon new feature creation. When doing white box testing, all of these expenses must be considered.
CodeBase That Is Constantly Changing
If the code base is constantly evolving, automated test cases become a waste of time. Many written test cases will become useless as a result of redesigns or reworks and will need to be rewritten.
Cases that were overlooked
White box testing tools is limited to validating and test features that are already in place. White-box testing will not detect if a feature is only partially implemented or if something is missing. This is where black-box testing with requirements is superior.
White Box tests has some distinct benefits and drawbacks. It’s important to think about whether the cost is worth the benefits, especially since mileage varies from project to project.
In penetration testing, a white box technique is useful for simulating the actions of an attacker who has complete knowledge of the target system’s internal structures. It gives the pen tester unrestricted access to all of the system’s data. As a result, the pen tester is able to find as many flaws as possible.
Of course, in some cases, other pen testing techniques, such as black box testing, can be used to put yourself in the shoes of an uninformed outside potential intruder.